Author(s):
Vibha, Kaur Khushpreet, Rattan Kajal, Kaur Kamaljit, Kaur Karamjeet, Kaur Kirandeep, Kaur Kiranpreet, Kaur Mandeep
Email(s):
batra12345batra@yahoo.co.in , lovemom.insan53@gmail.com
DOI:
10.52711/2454-2652.2022.00004 
Address:
Vibha1*, Kaur Khushpreet2, Rattan Kajal3, Kaur Kamaljit3, Kaur Karamjeet3, Kaur Kirandeep3, Kaur Kiranpreet3, Kaur Mandeep3
1Professor, State Institute of Nursing and Paramedical Sciences, Badal, Sri Muktsar Sahib, Punjab.
2Nursing Demonstrator, State Institute of Nursing and Paramedical Sciences, Badal, Sri Muktsar Sahib, Punjab.
3B.Sc (N) 4th yr Students, State Institute of Nursing and Paramedical Sciences, Badal, Sri Muktsar Sahib, Punjab.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 10,
Issue - 1,
Year - 2022
ABSTRACT:
Introduction and Aim: Every person has right to live and die with dignity. Pain is inevitable but suffering is optional. A person demands to get rid of suffering is not suicide or murder; it’s called “EUTHANASIA”, “MERCY KILLING”. The present study was aimed to assess the knowledge and attitude towards euthanasia among health care professionals. Methodology: A Quantitative Non-experimental descriptive research approach and design was used. Total 150 health care professionals were selected by Non-probability purposive sampling technique from selected Hospital of Punjab. Structured questionnaire was used to assess knowledge and attitude towards euthanasia among health care professionals. Result: The collected data was analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics which revealed that out of the 150 health care professionals 74(49.3%) were having good knowledge, followed by 57(38.0%) were having excellent knowledge and 19(12.7%) were having average level of knowledge. Similarly, majority of respondents 128(85.3%) were having Neutral attitude, 16(10.6%) were having favorable and only 06(4%) were having unfavorable attitude towards euthanasia. The correlation coefficient value is +0.98, that releaved that positive relationship with level of knowledge and attitude of health care professionals. The association of knowledge and attitude with selected demographic variables of health care professionals revealed that there was statistical significance association with level of knowledge and conference/ workshop/training attended by health care professionals and there was statistical significance association with attitude and age of health care professionals at 0.05 level of significance. Conclusion: The health care professionals having good knowledge and Neutral attitude towards euthanasia. There is broad scope to create awareness towards euthanasia among health care professionals.
Cite this article:
Vibha, Kaur Khushpreet, Rattan Kajal, Kaur Kamaljit, Kaur Karamjeet, Kaur Kirandeep, Kaur Kiranpreet, Kaur Mandeep. Knowledge and attitude towards euthanasia among health care professionals. International Journal of Advances in Nursing Management. 2022; 10(1):14-8. doi: 10.52711/2454-2652.2022.00004
Cite(Electronic):
Vibha, Kaur Khushpreet, Rattan Kajal, Kaur Kamaljit, Kaur Karamjeet, Kaur Kirandeep, Kaur Kiranpreet, Kaur Mandeep. Knowledge and attitude towards euthanasia among health care professionals. International Journal of Advances in Nursing Management. 2022; 10(1):14-8. doi: 10.52711/2454-2652.2022.00004 Available on: https://ijanm.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2022-10-1-4
REFERENCES:
1. Mystakidou, Kyriaki, Parpa, Efi, Tsilika, Eleni, Katsou, Emanuela, v\o Has. Lambros. “The evolution of euthanasia and its perception in greek culture and civilization”. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 2005;48(1): 97-98.
2. Stolberg, Michael. “Active Euthanasia in Pre – Modern society, 1500-1800: Learned Debates and Popular Practices” Social History of Medicine.2007; 20(2): 206-207.
3. Gesudheil, Benjamin, Steinberg, Avraham, Glide, Shimon, or Reuven, Jotkovitz, Alan. “Euthanasia: An overview and the Jewish Perspectives”. Cancer Investigation.2006; 24 (6): 621-9.
4. Stolberg, Michael. “Active Euthanasia in Pre – Modern society, 1500-1800: Learned Debates and Popular Practices” Social History of Medicine. 2007; 20(2): 206-207.
5. Gesudheil, Benjamin, Steinberg, Avraham, Glide, Shimon, or Reuven, Jotkovitz, Alan. “Euthanasia: An overview and the Jewish perspectives”. Cancer Investigation. 2006;24 (6): 621-9.
6. Stolberg, Michael. “Active Euthanasia in Pre – Modern society, 1500-1800: Learned Debates and Popular Practices” Social History of Medicine. 2007;20(2): 206-207.
7. Otani, Izumi. “Good Manner of Dying” as a normative concept: “Autocide”, “Granny Dumping”, and Discussions on Euthanasia/ Death with Dignity in Japan. International Journal of Japanese Society. 2010;19 (1): 49-63.
8. “Medical Assistance in Dying Bill”. Canada Justice Website 2016.
9. “Supreme Court Disallows Friend’s plea for Mercy Killing of vegetative Aruna”. The Hindu 7 March 2011.
10. Aruna Shanbaug case: sc allows passive euthanasia in path- Breaking Judgement.” The Time of India 7 march 2011.
11. “India Allows ‘Living Wills’ for Terminally Ill”. BBC News 2018.
12. Hemalatha, Rajlaxmi, “A study to assess the knowledge and attitude on euthanasia among health care professionals” International Journal Advance Scientific Research May 2018;3(3). Page no-23to 32
13. Mojtaba Senmar, Hossein Rafiei Mahdi Najafi. Clinical registered nurses attitude towards euthanasia: a cross sectional study from Iran. International Journal of Novel Research in Health Care and Nursing. 2016; 3(2)229-233.
14. Hui-ping Chen, Yu Jiang, Jie Liu. Attitudes of Chinese oncology physicians towards death with dignity. J Palliat Med. 2016. Aug 1; 19(8); 874-878
15. Ladan Naseh. Attitudes of Nursing Students to Euthanasia. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics. Jan-Mar. 2017; 2(1): 20-24.