Validity and Reliability Study of Premenstrual Syndrome Scale (PMSS)
Ms. P. Padmavathi1, Dr. Raja Sankar2, Dr. N. Kokilavani3, K. Dhanapal4, B. Ashok5
1Vice Principal, Dhanvantri College of Nursing, Ganapathypuram, NO – 1
Ranganoor Road, Muniyappan Kovil, Pallakkapalyam, Namakkal District – 637 303
2Associate Professor, Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Institute of Medical Sciences (MAPIMS), Melmaruvathur
3Principal Adhiparasakthi Collège of Nursing, Melmaruvathur
4HOD of Bio – Statistics Dhanvantri College of Nursing, Ganapathypuram, NO – 1 Ranganoor Road, Muniyappan kovil, Pallakkapalyam, Namakkal District – 637 303
5Assistant Professor, Adhiparasakthi Collège of Nursing, Melmaruvathur
*Corresponding Author Email: padmasekar20009@gmail.com
BACKGROUND:
Adequate symptoms assessment is essential in premenstrual syndrome prevention. Assessment scales were designed to support practitioners in identifying adolescents at premenstrual syndrome risk. The Premenstrual syndrome scale is one of the most extensively studied symptoms assessment instruments, although the majority of studies focused on validity rather than reliability.
OBJECTIVES:
· The first aim was to measure the interrater reliability of the Premenstrual syndrome scale and its individual items.
· The second aim was to study different statistical approaches regarding interrater reliability estimation.
DESIGN AND METHODS:
An interrater reliability study was conducted in selected private school, Namakkal District. Samples selected through simple random technique. Adolescents (n = 46) were assessed for menstrual five cycles. Data were analyzed using an overall percentage of agreement and the intraclass correlation coefficient.
VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY:
The ability of the Premenstrual syndrome Scale to predict the development of PUs (predictive validity) has been tested extensively. Inter-rater reliability (Cronbach's Alpha) was 0.97.
The tool has been shown to be equally reliable with adolescent girls. Sensitivity ranges from 83-100% and specificity 64-90% depending on the cut-off score used for predicting PU risk.
CONCLUSIONS:
Although the calculated interrater reliability coefficients for the total Premenstrual syndrome score were high in some cases, several clinically relevant differences occurred between the nurses. The calculation of weighted kappa or intraclass correlation coefficients is the most appropriate interrater reliability estimates.
PREMENSTRUAL SYNDROME SCALE (PMSS)
Each of the symptoms below, circle the number that most closely describes the intensity of your premenstrual symptoms during your last cycle. These are symptoms that would occur during the premenstrual phase of your cycle. This phase begins about seven days prior to menstrual bleeding (or seven days before your period) and ends about the time bleeding starts. Rate each item on this list on a scale from 1 (not present or no change from usual) to 5 (extreme change, perhaps noticeable even to casual acquaintances).
INTERPRETATION:
The premenstrual syndrome scale comprised 40 questions with three sub‑scales (Physiological, Psychological and Behavioural symptoms). This 5‑point Likert‑ type scale consisting of 40 items. The measurements on the scale are set according to the following scoring system: the response Never was scored as “1”, rarely as “2”, sometimes as “3”, very often as “4” and always as “5” points.
|
S.No |
Premenstrual syndrome scale (PMSS) |
SCORES |
||||
|
Never (1) |
Rarely (2) |
Sometimes (3) |
Very often (4) |
Always (5) |
||
|
|
Physiological symptoms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Breast tenderness and swelling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Abdominal bloating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
weight gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Headache |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Dizziness/fainting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Fatigue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
Palpitations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
Pelvic discomfort and pain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
Abdominal cramps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
Change in bowel habits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
Increased appetite |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
Generalized aches and pains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
Food cravings (Sugar/ Salt) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
Skin changes, rashes, pimples |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
Nausea/vomiting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
Muscle and Joint pain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Psychological symptoms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
Irritability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
Anxiety |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
Tension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
Mood swings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
Loss of concentration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
Depression |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
Forgetfulness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
Easy crying/ Crying spells |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
Sleep changes (Insomnia/ hypersomnia) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
Confusion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
Aggression |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Hopelessness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Behavioural symptoms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
Social withdrawal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
Restlessness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
Lack of self control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Feeling guilty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
Clumsiness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
Lack of interest in usual activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
Poor judgment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
Impaired work performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
Obsessional thoughts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
Compulsive behavior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
Irrational thoughts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
Being over sensitive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level of symptoms |
Actual Scores |
Percentage of Scores |
|
No symptoms |
1- 40 |
< 20 |
|
Mild symptoms - only slightly apparent |
41 - 80 |
21 -40 |
|
Moderate symptoms - aware of symptom, but it doesn’t affect daily activity at all |
81 – 120 |
41 60 |
|
Severe - continuously bothered by symptoms |
121 - 160 |
61 -80 |
|
very severe - symptom is overwhelming and /or interferes with daily activity |
161 -200 |
> 80 |
In addition, the total score obtained from the sub‑scales established the “PMSS total score.” The scale’s lowest score is 40 and highest score is 200. If the scale’s total score reached 80 points or above, this indicates the occurrence of PMS. Increases in the scores indicate an increase in PMS severity.
SCORING PROCEDURE:
Based on the percentage of scores the levels of premenstrual symptoms were graded in four categories. They are “No symptoms”, “Mild”, “Moderate” “severe” and very severe symptoms.
REFERENCES
1. www.premcal.com
2. www.smj.org.sa
3. Allen S, et al. The Shortened Premenstrual Assessment Form. J Reprod Med. 1991;36(11):769-72.
4. Lee MH, Kim JW, Lee JH, Kim DM. The Standardization of the Shortened Premenstrual Assessment Form and Applicability on the Internet
5. Mai Eissa, Personality and Psychosocial Factors Affecting Premenstrual Syndrome, Current Psychiatry; Vol. 17, No. 1, 2010: 55-62
6. JOSEPH L. MAYO, Premenstrual Syndrome: A Natural Approach to Management, Advanced Nutrition Publications, Inc. rev. 1999
Received on 23.07.2013 Modified on 22.11.2013
Accepted on 02.12.2013 © A&V Publication all right reserved
Int. J. Adv. Nur. Management 2(1):Jan. - Mar., 2014; Page 04-05